<p class="story-body-text story-content" data-para-count="159" data-total-count="159">Since the election, stock prices have risen sharply on hopes that a wave of pro-growth policies under Donald J. Trump will drive up equity prices even further.</p> <p class="story-body-text story-content" data-para-count="166" data-total-count="325">But Mr. Trump’s administration will soon face a trend that threatens to move the long-term benefits found in stock markets away from investors and toward exchanges.</p> <p class="story-body-text story-content" data-para-count="166" data-total-count="325">Continue reading in The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/23/business/dealbook/who-benefits-from-market-speed-bumps-the-exchanges.html?_r=0">New York Times</a></p> <p class="story-body-text story-content" data-para-count="166" data-total-count="325"><em>Holly A. Bell is an associate professor at the University of Alaska in Anchorage and a consulting scholar on financial market structure and regulation. She is also the author of the thriller <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Trading-Salvos-Kate-Adams-Novel-ebook/dp/B01H0OOUE0">“Trading Salvos.”</a></em></p>
<em>This article was originally posted on TabbForum <a href="http://tabbforum.com/opinions/associate-professor-university-of-alaska-anchorage">here</a></em> By Holly A. Bell Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich claims financial transaction taxes are simply sales taxes on Wall Street traders and won’t harm markets or cause capital to flee. Yet studies of FTTs in other countries show they harm Main Street and distort markets. Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich recently produced a snappy video about why financial transactions taxes (FTTs) as proposed by Bernie Sander’s on the campaign trail should be retained and turned into law. Unfortunately, his pithy presentation is wrought with inaccuracies. He begins by modifying the language of FTTs by shruggingly telling us it’s just a sales tax. We pay sales taxes on many things and it’s only “fair,” he claims, that anyone who sells a stock should pay a tax too. Yet it’s not exactly like a sales tax. For one thing, it’s not transparent. When you go
Ill-considered regulation regarding algorithmic trading will adversely affect the ability of legitimate market participants to contribute to liquidity, price discovery, narrow spreads, and low trading costs. The CFTC shares with market participants a growing interest in algorithmic trading and its potential effects on the markets. Rather than working with market participants cooperatively, the Commission proposes a prescriptive regime applicable to virtually any firm that trades in the futures (and swaps) markets. If finalized, this proposal will establish an approach dominated by enforcement that will chill firms’ willingness to work with the Commission to address emerging problems in the area. In addition, by opening firms’ source code to unlimited inspection by the Commission and others, the proposal creates dangerous vulnerabilities for an asset of utmost importance to trading firms. <strong>To see full article click <a href="http://mercatus.org/publication/potential-effects-reg-unintended-risks-and-diminished-cooperation-market-participants">here</a></strong>
Life is weird sometimes. I had a pretty great week last week. I got to go to Chicago early in the week to speak at a conference on high-frequency and algorithmic trading and meet a lot of interesting--and frighteningly smart--people. I always enjoy getting my nerd on with other academics and policy wonks especially when combined with industry experts and a guy who started university at 14 and now builds neural networks to create artificial intelligence-type systems to trade stocks. For about 2 1/2 minutes I was even able to hold my own in a conversation with him about how his systems handle outliers in their outputs. Being in Chicago also allowed me to enjoy their freakishly warm 70-degree temperatures while Alaska was experiencing slick roads due to freezing rain and snow. Upon returning home I received another speaking invitation and an offer to be a guest on Reuters Global Markets Forum.
<h3 class="dek">What motivates countries to discourage HFT?<a href="http://www.professorhollybell.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ID-100173239.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2696" src="http://www.professorhollybell.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ID-100173239-300x211.jpg" alt="HFT" width="300" height="211" /></a></h3> <p class="dek">"While there are several empirically demonstrated benefits of high-frequency trading, including improved liquidity and reduced transaction costs, the current arguments against HFT are largely qualitative in nature. With that in mind, what are the drivers behind global HFT regulation, and do they suggest a market failure attributable to HFT?"</p> <p class="dek">My article, previewed above, is available at <a href="http://tabbforum.com/opinions/hft-regulation-requires-attention-to-motives-and-consequences" target="_blank">Tabb Forum</a></p> <h3 class="dek"><a href="http://www.professorhollybell.com">Return to homepage</a></h3>
<h2 class="p1"><a href="http://www.professorhollybell.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ID-10068053.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2692" src="http://www.professorhollybell.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ID-10068053-300x199.jpg" alt="HFT Regulation" width="300" height="199" /></a>Motivations, Market Failures, and Alternative Outcomes</h2> <p class="p1">"Recent market events like the “flash crash” of 2010, algorithmic failures at Knight Capital, and the <span style="font-size: 11.818181991577148px;">release of Michael Lewis’s book Flash Boys (2014)—with his claims that markets are “rigged”—have </span><span style="font-size: 11.818181991577148px;">heightened scrutiny of high-frequency trading (HFT) and increased demands for more aggressive </span><span style="font-size: 11.818181991577148px;">regulation. However, HFT has several empirically demonstrated benefits, and the current, largely </span><span style="font-size: 11.818181991577148px;">qualitative arguments against it call for careful scrutiny of proposed regulations.</span></p> <p class="p2"><span style="font-size: 11.818181991577148px;">In a new study for the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Holly A. Bell and Harrison </span><span style="font-size: 11.818181991577148px;">Searles analyze the potential economic benefits of HFT and assess several proposed or adopted </span><span style="font-size: 11.818181991577148px;">regulatory schemes from around the world."</span></p> <p class="p2">The full study is available from the Mercatus Center by clicking <a title="An Analysis of Global HFT Regulation" href="http://mercatus.org/sites/default/files/Bell_GlobalHFTRegulation_v2.pdf" target="_blank">here</a></p> <p class="p2"><em>Holly A. Bell